Document Type
Article
Publication Date
5-2013
Department
Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science
Keywords
imputation, dosage, genome-wide association studies
Abstract
Objective: The use of haplotypes to impute the genotypes of unmeasured single nucleotide variants continues to rise in popularity. Simulation results suggest that the use of the dosage as a one-dimensional summary statistic of imputation posterior probabilities may be optimal both in terms of statistical power and computational efficiency; however, little theoretical understanding is available to explain and unify these simulation results. In our analysis, we provide a theoretical foundation for the use of the dosage as a one-dimensional summary statistic of genotype posterior probabilities from any technology. Methods: We analytically evaluate the dosage, mode and the more general set of all one-dimensional summary statistics of two-dimensional (three posterior probabilities that must sum to 1) genotype posterior probability vectors. Results: We prove that the dosage is an optimal one-dimensional summary statistic under a typical linear disease model and is robust to violations of this model. Simulation results confirm our theoretical findings. Conclusions: Our analysis provides a strong theoretical basis for the use of the dosage as a one-dimensional summary statistic of genotype posterior probability vectors in related tests of genetic association across a wide variety of genetic disease models.
Source Publication Title
Human Heredity
Publisher
Karger
Volume
75
Issue
1
First Page
2
DOI
10.1159/000349974
Recommended Citation
Liu K, Luedtke A, and Tintle NL (2013) “Optimal methods for using posterior probabilities in association testing” Human Heredity. 75(1): 2-11. doi:10.1159/000349974
Included in
Bioinformatics Commons, Genetics and Genomics Commons, Statistics and Probability Commons
Comments
This is a pre-publication author manuscript of the following final, published article: Liu K, Luedtke A, and Tintle NL (2013) “Optimal methods for using posterior probabilities in association testing” Human Heredity. 75(1): 2-11. doi:10.1159/000349974
The definitive version is published by Karger and available at http://www.karger.com/?DOI=10.1159/000349974